基于修正系数与风险耦合矩阵的天然气管道风险评价模型

Natural gas pipeline risk assessment model based on correction coefficients and risk coupling matrix

  • 摘要: 针对传统管道风险评价方法(如肯特法)中静态评分体系对实际工况适应性不足,以及GB/T 27512—2011《埋地钢质管道风险评估方法》对多因素耦合机制量化缺失的问题,构建动态修正与风险耦合的天然气管道风险评价模型,实现失效可能性与后果的精细化分级。建立五维失效可能性指标体系(腐蚀/设计/第三方破坏/误操作/自然灾害),基于历史事故数据计算基础失效概率,结合管道实际参数通过修正系数ηi动态调整概率值;构建介质-受体双层耦合后果评价体系,采用耦合矩阵量化介质危害性与受体敏感性的交互作用,通过风险矩阵整合可能性与后果等级,输出Ⅰ~Ⅳ级综合风险量化结果。以国内某天然气管道为例开展了模型的实际应用,结果表明,管道综合失效概率为8.781×10-5/(km·a),其中设计缺陷贡献率最高(34.2%);失效后果得分792分(轻微风险),介质扩散性对人口密度影响显著;综合风险等级为Ⅰ级(轻微),关键风险源为工作压力及土壤腐蚀性。本模型不仅直接输出定量化的失效概率,还能精准定位风险传导的关键路径,可为高后果区精准防控提供决策支持,推动管道风险管理从静态向智能动态转型。

     

    Abstract: To address the limited adaptability of traditional static scoring systems (such as the Kent method) and the lack of quantified multi-factor coupling in the GB/T 27512—2011 Risk Assessment Methods for Buried Steel Pipelines standard, a natural gas pipeline risk assessment model with dynamic correction and risk coupling was developed to enable more precise classification of failure probabilities and consequences. A five-dimensional failure probability indicator system (corrosion, design, third-party damage, misoperation, natural disaster) was established, with the basic failure probability calculated from historical accident data and dynamically adjusted using the correction coefficient ηi in conjunction with actual pipeline parameters. A medium-receptor double-layer coupling consequence assessment system was constructed, in which the coupling matrix was applied to quantify the interaction between medium hazard and receptor sensitivity. The probability and consequence levels were integrated through a risk matrix, and comprehensive risk quantification results for levels Ⅰ-Ⅴ were produced. The model was applied to a natural gas pipeline in China, revealing a comprehensive failure probability of 8.781×10-5/(km·a), with design defects contributing the most (34.2%). The failure consequence score was 792 points, indicating minor risk, while medium diffusivity significantly affected population density. The overall risk level was classified as Grade Ⅰ (minor), with operating pressure and soil corrosivity identified as key risk factors. The model not only directly outputs a quantitative failure probability but also accurately identifies key risk transmission paths. It supports precise prevention and control in high-consequence areas and advances pipeline risk management from static to intelligent dynamic approaches.

     

/

返回文章
返回